1 week ago
3
ARTICLE AD BOX
NEW DELHI: Supreme Court Tuesday asked states, which person enacted anti-conversion legislations and astir of which are governed by BJP, to record their responses to pleas challenging stringent provisions successful those laws criminalising inter-faith marriages.
The laws question to prohibit conversion done threat, allurement, deceit oregon influence, reports Dhananjay Mahapatra. At the aforesaid time, SC enactment the onus connected individuals to beryllium their marital ties haven't been forged done deceit.SC: Will see frost connected anti-conversion laws aft states' responses A seat of Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justice K V Vinod Chandran asked the states which person enacted the anti-conversion laws, besides known arsenic 'Freedom of Religion Acts', to respond to the allegations levelled by petitioners, including Teesta Setalvad-led Citizens for Justice and Peace, People's Union for Civil Liberties, women's helping of Communist Party of India - National Federation of Indian Women and Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind. The states which person enacted anti-conversion laws see UP, Gujarat, Chhattisgarh, MP, Rajasthan, Uttarakhand, Maharashtra, Haryana, Odisha, HP, Jharkhand, Karnataka and Arunachal Pradesh.Responding to the plea by petitioners for staying the laws, the seat said it volition see freezing them aft the states record their responses. It asked the states to record their effect successful 4 weeks and posted the substance for proceeding aft six weeks.
Senior advocator C U Singh, appearing for CJP, said the petitioner has sought support to amend the petition to situation the changes made successful the anti-conversion instrumentality of Uttar Pradesh, which present supply for a minimum punishment of 20 years incarceration connected condemnation nether the law. He said getting bail nether specified stringent laws would beryllium precise difficult. The seat permitted the petitioner to amend the petition.Senior advocator Indira Jaising sought transportation of a petition, which is pending successful Madhya Pradesh precocious tribunal challenging the state's anti-conversion law, to Supreme Court.
Additional solicitor wide K M Nataraj said each petitions pending successful HCs could beryllium transferred to SC for adjudication to debar multiplicity of proceedings connected the aforesaid contented and for a broad ruling. The tribunal ordered the de-tagging of advocator Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay's plea seeking prohibition connected conversion. The CJI asked however conversion could beryllium banned, starring the advocator to accidental helium was for stringent laws against conversion by matrimony based connected deceit and allurement.
