1 day ago
13
ARTICLE AD BOX
NEW DELHI: In a lawsuit reflective of narration issues that are unsocial to today's times, Supreme Court has travel to the alleviation of an 80-year-old antheral and his 78-year-old woman and ordered eviction of their 61-year-old lad from 2 rooms owned by the antheral successful Mumbai aft helium failed to supply them with maintenance, arsenic mandated nether the Maintenance and Welfare of Senior Citizens Act, 2007.The octogenarian begetter and his woman had moved backmost to their autochthonal municipality successful Uttar Pradesh aft being pushed retired of the properties - 1 country astatine Yadav Chawl successful Yadav Nagar and different astatine Raju Estate, Bengali Chawl, Saki Naka -- by their eldest lad who was moving a concern there.In July 2023, they filed for attraction and eviction of their lad from the said properties earlier the tribunal concerned, which successful June past twelvemonth directed the antheral to manus implicit possession of some the rooms to his parents and besides supply them with a monthly attraction of Rs 3,000.
The son's situation was rejected by the appellate tribunal. He past appealed against the eviction bid successful Bombay HC.The HC, connected April 25, allowed the son's petition connected the crushed that the tribunal did not person the jurisdiction to walk an bid for abrogation of spot against a elder citizen, the lad being implicit 60 years old. The parents moved the SC against the HC order.A seat of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta termed the Bombay precocious tribunal bid erroneous and highlighted that the antheral was 59 years aged erstwhile his parents moved the tribunal nether the 2007 Act, which was enacted to code the plight of the aged and to guarantee their attraction and protection.
"Being a payment legislation, its provisions indispensable beryllium construed liberally truthful arsenic to beforehand its beneficent purpose. This Court connected respective occasions has observed that the Tribunal is good wrong its powers to bid eviction of a kid oregon a comparative from the spot of a elder citizen, erstwhile determination is simply a breach of the work to support the elder citizen," the seat said.Asking the lad to vacate the 2 rooms successful Mumbai and manus implicit their possession to his parents by Nov 30, the seat said, "In the contiguous case, contempt being financially stable, the lad has acted successful breach of his statutory obligations successful not allowing the parents to reside successful the properties owned by the father, thereby frustrating the precise entity of the Act. The HC fell successful mistake successful allowing the writ petition connected a wholly untenable ground.
"
