1 day ago
3
ARTICLE AD BOX
Sameer Wankhede has taken ineligible enactment successful the Delhi High Court against the Netflix series, 'The Ba***ds of Bollywood', directed by Aryan Khan, and Red Chillies Entertainment Pvt Ltd., the accumulation location owned by Bollywood superstar Shah Rukh Khan and his wife, Gauri Khan.
Who is Sameer Wankhede?
Sameer Wankhede is simply a erstwhile Mumbai zonal manager astatine the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) and an Indian Revenue Service (IRS) officer. He has handled respective high-profile drug-related investigations during his career, which brought him into the spotlight. On the idiosyncratic front, helium is joined to histrion
Kranti Redkar
.
What is the past nexus betwixt Sameer Wankhede and Aryan Khan?
Aryan Khan was caught up successful an alleged high-profile cause lawsuit successful 2021. As reported by NDTV, Aryan and six others were arrested by the NCB connected October 3, 2021.
Sameer Wankhede, who was past heading the Mumbai NCB, led the probe and was wide successful the news.Aryan spent galore days successful jailhouse earlier helium was granted bail. He was aboriginal cleared of each charges. In fact, the NCB itself, this clip a squad led by SK Singh, acknowledged the "lack of evidence" and criticised aspects of Wankhede’s investigation.
Why did Sameer Wankhede instrumentality ineligible action?
As reported by ANI, Wankhede’s suit claims that 'The Ba***ds of Bollywood' portrays him successful a "false, malicious, and defamatory" manner.
He alleges that the bid "disseminates a misleading and antagonistic portrayal of anti-drug enforcement agencies, thereby eroding nationalist assurance successful instrumentality enforcement institutions."He besides argues that the bid was "deliberately conceptualised and executed with the intent to malign Sameer Wankhede's estimation successful a colourable and prejudicial manner, peculiarly erstwhile proceedings involving him and Aryan Khan stay pending earlier the Bombay High Court and the NDPS Special Court, Mumbai."
Sameer Wankhede points to obscene motion country controversy
The suit refers to a peculiar series successful the amusement wherever a quality makes an obscene motion aft reciting 'Satyamev Jayate'. Wankhede contends that this enactment "constitutes a sedate and delicate usurpation of the provisions of the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971, which attracts penal consequences nether the law."He besides claims that the contented goes against respective provisions of the Information Technology Act and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), arguing that it seeks "to outrage nationalist sentiment done the usage of obscene and violative material."
What is Sameer Wankhede seeking?
The study further reveals that, the suit requests a imperishable and mandatory injunction, a declaration of the series’ defamatory nature, and damages. Wankhede has asked that damages of Rs 2 crore beryllium awarded and donated to the Tata Memorial Cancer Hospital to enactment crab patients.He besides wants the tribunal to restrain the streaming and organisation of 'The Ba***ds of Bollywood'. According to his plea, the portrayal not lone harms his idiosyncratic estimation but besides "undermines religion successful institutions liable for enforcing cause laws."
The Delhi High Court is expected to perceive the substance soon.
About ‘The Ba***ds of Bollywood'
‘The Ba***ds of Bollywood' is Aryan Khan’s directorial debut. The bid centres connected a high-stakes play wherever an ambitious outsider and his friends navigate the chaotic, larger-than-life, and unpredictable satellite of Bollywood. It features actors similar Bobby Deol, Lakshya, and Raghav Juyal successful salient roles. The amusement besides includes peculiar cameos from Bollywood stars specified arsenic Ranbir Kapoor, Salman Khan, Aamir Khan,
Ranveer Singh
, and others, adding prima powerfulness and glamour to the storyline.Disclaimer: The accusation successful this nonfiction is based connected ineligible proceedings arsenic reported by third-party sources. The details bespeak allegations made by the parties progressive and are not established facts. This work does not asseverate that the allegations are existent and is intended for informational purposes only.
